I started experimenting with the window motor, and am amazed at its simplicity in its design. This is what Rick had in his Free Energy Boat and Car. Not the SG…..but the window motor. That tells you something. On the internet people get these things to run at resonance with a cap for hours…days possibly putting out lots of torque with no battery connected!

Orientation of Magnets on the rotor is:  N-S-N-S-N-S

My simplified redraw of the Tiny Bedini-Cole Window motor on a SG circuit:


The reason the window motor is so powerful, is the minor current required is an INDEPENDENT VARIABLE from the power of the permanent magnets on the rotors. The true power lies in the magnetic flux lines of the permanent magnets, the more powerful the magnet, the less power you need to run the motor! True aether energy tapping, as I had originally conceived in principle.

The problem with the SG is that the shaft takes the brunt of the trigger coil pulse force making for a very inefficient way of causing the wheel to spin. You want the trigger coil to pulse in the direction of motion NOT perpendicular to it!!!!!! Like I said before the SG in some ways appears to be designed inefficiently on purpose…

Another limiting factor on the SG is the core material on the coils. Free energy comes from rapid parametric variation as per Eric Dollard. The core material on the SG is welding rods, now this does cut down on some hysteresis but the overall hysteresis curve still isn’t that great. You want a very steep BH curve. Bedini himself says NOT to use neodynium magnets on the SG, they saturate the core too much, and by the time the next magnet comes by the core hasn’t finished un-saturating and you subsequently don’t get a full inductive collapse. This is a speed limiting factor and thus a power output limiting factor. In order to be able to use neodynium magnets and spin the rotor at higher speeds you would have to use an exotic metal such as mu metal or metglas. Something with a very steep bh curve, facilitating faster inductive collapse/ paramateric variation. If you have an iron core…wow that’s going to be a serious limiting factor. Lindemann talking about Muller said he used a special type of Black Sand.

From the conference I remember there was 2 distinct ways of configuring the window motor:

  1. As an Energizer….(however I don’t think this did OU)
  2. As a high speed/high torque motor….(which kept primary battery charged, while providing free torque?)

The beauty of the window motor is the rotating flux fields push it in the direction of motion you want it to go. Hence high torque, and more speed, and more energy tapping from the aether!! It’s about a gazillion times more efficient way of producing motion and torque.

The Australian guy and myself were at the conference and Rick was presenting the window motor saying it could give off 50 horsepower with a fairly small volt/amp input…The Australian and myself thought wow, that seems too good to be true. Doing a rough calculation…that is 50hp x 746 Watts = 37,300 Watts……that’s a lot of light bulbs. 373 – 100 watt light bulbs to be exact. 37kW output and I think the input was like a half or 1kW?? Or none? COP of roughly 37 – 74 – infinity!?

At the conference they barely talked about the window motor, referring to it more as a side novelty…the SG was the prime focus. Really I don’t understand why you would waste time on the SG if the window motor is far superior!?!?…..it makes no sense from a free energy self-runner point of view!

That window motor is for sale on the R-Charge site now…going for $8000.00 and a 2 month production time.

The tiny Bedini-Cole window motor circuit and the Bedini school girl (SG) circuit are identical.

There is another circuit for the window motor called the Bedini-Cole Bipolar Circuit with 2 hall effect sensors for timing. I believe this is a more advanced and efficient circuit.

When bumping up the voltage from 12V to 24V on the window motor the, speed ramps up drastically.

This got me thinking, on ways to eliminate back EMF. Back EMF is a function of current and according to ohm’s law the higher the voltage, the less current there is. So a great way of reducing back EMF is simply raising voltage. You can deliver the same amount of power to a coil, but with less current, and ideally like Tesla trying to eliminating current all together.

When the coil is allowed to discharge, it will discharge the power that was transferred to the coil. Aaron has a good post here describing Back EMF.

Now the fascinating thing is trying to get the window motor to run at resonance. This should drastically increase power output,  torque and speed. Because the inductive spikes coming off the Power Coil are negative resistance and have “extra” energy if this is fed into a capacitor which is dumped back into the power coil an effective tank circuit can be constructed.  Here is a good visual representation of a tank circuit. Thus it would appear possible if impedance’s are properly matched to get a self resonating system going where power is increased, via radiant spikes connected in a feedback loop. Plus all the torque is free!

This is VERY similar to the Joule Ringer, which is a feedback tank like circuit. Watch the video here. The problem I see is that the back-EMF on the coil, and the resistance in the wire eventually eats up enough of the excess energy produced, it stops. Back-EMF can probably be largely eliminated by using higher voltages and the resistance in the wire with room temperature super conductors or something.

If Tesla were at it, he would probably run it at ridiculously high voltage and frequency and eliminate all current together and have ether flows going between the points instead of electrons.

These are all very interesting experiments to try.

Going back to the Tank Circuit idea, Eric Dollard is big on a Change in Capacitance from higher to lower being negative conductance. It’s possible to get “free energy” out of a discharging capacitor as well in addition to the radiant spike which occurs when the inductor discharges. Now if we loop these two PLUS get them to run at resonance, then there are two possible mechanisms at work pulling in ether energy.

“So the aim of our game is to change the parameters of our circuit as quickly as we can to create/cohere energy and if this energy gain is higher than the resistive losses plus the energy required to change the parameter we have excess energy we can use to power a load!

An effective way of capacitance changing can be by alternating between series and parallel configuration of a bank of capacitors.” ~ Raui

Eric Dollard utilized Caps in his car and got them to self oscillate by suing a vibrator. Charge caps in parallel, then discharge in series for max votlage output. Design a switch for this to work in conjunction with a tank circuit. Caps need to be rated for high voltage in order to properly and efficiently absorb the large voltage spikes coming from the inductive radiant spikes.

Impedance matching is the key to getting a system to oscillate at resonance. Resonance is a magnification/multiplication of energy.

Things to research/Test

  • Bifilar vs Trifilar vs Single wire coils
  • Coils in toroid config
  • Coils very close to magnets
  • # of wires, AWG ratings
  • Other geometries, Caduceus, Spiral, Vortexial,



Joule Ringer

Another cool aspect that relates to getting a Bedini Cole window to self-run via feedback oscillations is lasersaber’s joule ringer. He’s got circuits that make use of a bi-filar wound inductor that are bouncing energy back into a capacitor while running a load.